I like the idea a lot. The issues as I see them are ones of verification and vandalism.
When it comes to making sure that the information presented actually backed by something legitimate would be a difficult but valuable tool. It couldnt really be a place for a stricly anecdotes as that is basically the function that the forum serves.
By vandalism, I mean that UpRiver would need to prevent anyone from going into the open source articles and changing things that were previously written and accepted.
I don’t have a ton of background in this space, but its something that, if we can make it work around these two issues I’ve raised, would be an incredible contribution to the platform.
.
